The President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, said ”the implementation of this resolution is vital for the protection of all civilians”.

 “The United Nations Security Council resolution is fully consistent with the conclusions on the Middle East adopted by the European Council last week,” said EU foreign affairs  spokesperson Peter Stano at the European Commission’s daily briefing.

“The United States makes itself look weaker on the world stage by abstaining on a pro-Hamas resolution backed by China and Russia…The more Washington projects distance from a close ally, the more America’s adversaries take note and get emboldened,” said Richard Goldberg, a senior adviser at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

 

The European Union welcomed the adoption by the UN Security Council of a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza for the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said on X that the resolution “demands an immediate ceasefire during Ramadan, leading to a lasting ceasefire, the unconditional release of all prisoners and stresses the need to increase the flow of aid and protect civilians.’’

Borrell added: “This resolution must be implemented as a matter of urgency by all parties concerned.’’

The resolution was supported by 14 nations, including veto holders China, Russia, the United Kingdom and France. U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield abstained, allowing the resolution to pass.

The President of the European Council, Charles Michael, said: “I welcome the vote in the UN Security Council, which clearly calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.

“It is now urgent that this ceasefire be respected”, he added.

The President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, also welcomed the resolution, declaring: “The implementation of this resolution is vital for the protection of all civilians”.

French Foreign Minister Stéphane Séjourné said: “I welcome the adoption of the Security Council resolution on the Middle East”.

“It must be fully implemented”, he added.

Reacting to the adoption of the resolution, Belgian Foreign Minister Hajda Lahbib, whose country currently holds the EU six-monthly chairmanship, declared: “Weapons must be silenced, prisoners must be released and aid must reach the Palestinians in Gaza”.

“The United Nations Security Council resolution is fully consistent with the conclusions on the Middle East adopted by the European Council last week,” said Tuesday EU foreign affairs  spokesperson Peter Stano at the European Commission’s daily briefing.

The EU has also stressed the importance of the urgent implementation of the UNSC resolution, he added. He recalled that Security Council resolutions are basically considered to be international law and should be respected and implemented by all UN members.

‘’The two decisions are the basis of how the EU will engage and work with its partners to end the human suffering in Gaza and advance towards what it considers to be the only sustainable solution to the conflict, which is the two-state solution,’’ the spokesperson added.

Asked if the EU’s position is that Hamas has no place in Gaza ‘’the day after’’, Peter Stano responded :  “Indeed, Hamas is a terrorist organisation and there is no place for it in Gaza in the political set-up after the war.”

Israeli government officials condemn the UNSC resolution 

Israeli government officials were near-unanimous in their condemnation of a U.N. Security Council resolution demanding a two-week halt to the war against Hamas, with Prime Minister Netanyahu slamming the U.S. decision to refrain from exercising its veto power.

“The United States has abandoned its policy in the U.N. today,” said Netanyahu, according to a statement released by his office. He noted that just days ago, Washington had supported a draft resolution that directly linked a call for a truce to the release of hostages.

While the resolution adopted on Monday does call for the “immediate and unconditional release of all hostages,” the text leaves it open to interpretation whether this is actually linked to the ceasefire demand.

The premier’s sentiment was echoed by Likud Party lawmaker Danny Danon, a member of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee who served as ambassador to the United Nations between 2015 and 2020.

“Unfortunately, this reminds me of the U.N. Security Council’s 2016 vote in which the Obama administration decided to abstain rather than exercise its veto power,” Danon told JNS, referring to UNSC resolution 2334, which condemned Israeli construction beyond the 1967 lines.

Richard Goldberg, a senior adviser at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said that although “the resolution demands a ceasefire and separately demands the release of hostages, it does not call for a ceasefire that is conditioned on hostages being released.”

The White House has claimed that the vote did not mark a departure from the administration’s previous stance, but according to Goldberg the decision to abstain does in fact represent a “clear shift in policy.”

“Just last Friday, the Americans proposed a draft that called for a ceasefire in connection with the release of hostages. Three days later, the standard is merely that you talk about a ceasefire and the release of hostages in the same general location [of the text], not that the two must go hand in hand,” he said.

“The United States makes itself look weaker on the world stage by abstaining on a pro-Hamas resolution backed by China and Russia…The more Washington projects distance from a close ally, the more America’s adversaries take note and get emboldened,” the analyst added.

According to Netanyahu, Resolution 2728 “gives Hamas hope that international pressure will force Israel to accept a ceasefire without the release of our hostages,” harming both military and diplomatic efforts.

Danon concurred that Washington’s abstention marked a policy shift.

“One cannot ignore the fact that allowing this resolution to pass is a change in policy; our colleagues in Washington are aware of it. This isn’t only about the language, which is problematic. This is a slippery slope for more resolutions to pass,” he said.

Following Monday’s vote, the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office canceled the departure of a high-level delegation that was slated to fly to Washington this week to discuss the looming Israeli ground operation against Hamas in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah.

Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant—who arrived in the U.S. capital on Monday at the invitation of his American counterpart—stressed in an apparent response to the developments at the United Nations that Israel has “no moral right to stop the war while there are still hostages held in Gaza.”

He also warned that failure to achieve decisive victory in Gaza could bring Israel closer to a war against Hezbollah.

His words were echoed by Minister-without-Portfolio and War Cabinet member Benny Gantz, who vowed to continue military efforts “until the hostages are returned and the Hamas threat is removed.”

The National Unity Party leader dismissed the UNSC decision as “lacking operational significance” for the Israel Defense Forces. At the same time, Gantz urged Netanyahu “to travel to the United States himself and hold a direct dialogue with President [Joe] Biden and senior officials.”

“The special relationship between Israel and the United States is an anchor in Israel’s security and foreign relations, and the direct dialogue with the American administration is an essential asset that must not be given up even when there are challenges and disputes,” he said.

Foreign Minister Israel Katz was short in his response, tweeting on Monday: “The State of Israel will not cease fire. We will destroy Hamas, and will continue to fight until the return of all hostages to home.”

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who also holds the post of minister in the Defense Ministry, likewise pledged to continue fighting in Gaza “until Hamas is completely destroyed and the hostages are returned.”

“The U.S. decision not to impose a veto in the Security Council plays into Hamas’s hands and harms efforts to return the hostages and stabilize the region by eliminating the radical forces and strengthening the moderate forces,” charged Smotrich.

Israel’s minister of national security, Otzma Yehudit Party leader Itamar Ben-Gvir, tweeted “Um-Shmum,” using a traditional Hebrew expression indicating utter disgust for the United Nations’ bias against the Jewish state.

Ministry of Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism Amichai Chikli noted that “the rapists and child murderers of Hamas” had praised the U.N. resolution, and accused the body of having lost its moral compass.

“You claimed to stand with the victims when their blood was flowing; you claimed to stand with the hostages when their cries still echoed; are you deserting them now?” he asked.

Meanwhile, Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid (Yesh Atid) directed most of his criticism at Netanyahu, blaming the premier for fabricating an “unnecessary and avoidable” clash with Biden for political gain.

“This is an alarming irresponsibility from a prime minister who has lost it,” tweeted Lapid, though he added that “the latest Security Council decision has no practical importance [for Israel].”

According to a survey published earlier this month, even Israelis who do not back Netanyahu’s leadership continue to support some of his key war policies, including his opposition to the two-state solution and his insistence that the IDF defeat the Hamas battalions in Rafah.